Rúben Amorim’s approach to leadership, though perhaps intended to enforce total dedication, ultimately drifted into territory that many within the club viewed as counterproductive and overly intrusive.
His methods appeared to prioritise rigid control over human understanding, creating an atmosphere that strained relationships rather than strengthening them.
Two policies in particular came to symbolise this breakdown: the so-called International Holiday Ban and the controversial No Food rule at the training ground.
The reported ban on players taking approved breaks during FIFA international windows treated experienced professionals less like elite athletes and more like disobedient students.
It failed to recognise the physical and psychological value of short periods of rest, family time, and mental reset.
Instead of fostering loyalty and motivation, the policy bred frustration and resentment, leaving players feeling confined and undervalued.
The club environment, once associated with pride and ambition, began to feel restrictive and joyless.
Even more alarming was the alleged No Food policy, believed to have been enforced either as a collective punishment for poor performances or as an extreme fitness measure.
Denying players access to proper meals crossed a clear line. Beyond the obvious concerns around nutrition and health, it turned a basic human necessity into a disciplinary weapon.
This approach eroded trust, damaged morale, and replaced a culture of support with one of fear and petty enforcement, undermining the very performance standards it aimed to improve.
The arrival of Michael Carrick has marked a dramatic and refreshing contrast. In the aftermath of Amorim’s departure, a sense of relief has spread through Carrington and among supporters. Carrick’s first major act was not to impose new restrictions, but to remove the most divisive ones.
By scrapping both the holiday ban and the food policy, he signalled an immediate cultural reset — one rooted in respect, balance, and professionalism.
Rather than governing through deprivation, Carrick has introduced what insiders describe as a single guiding principle: a “new rule” based on mutual commitment. While its exact wording remains internal, its meaning is evident in practice.
The club’s responsibility is to provide an elite, supportive environment — including proper nutrition, intelligent training methods, and respect for players’ lives beyond football. In exchange, players are expected to give total focus, effort, and accountability on the pitch.
This is not a lowering of standards, but an evolution of them. Carrick’s philosophy recognises that modern footballers perform best when treated as trusted professionals, not controlled subjects.
Rested minds, well-fuelled bodies, and strong personal foundations translate into sharper concentration, greater resilience, and improved performances. Empowerment, not intimidation, becomes the driving force behind excellence.
The effects of this shift are already being felt. Morale has lifted as trust is rebuilt and players sense the club is once again aligned with their wellbeing. Performance levels benefit naturally from improved physical and mental conditions.
Perhaps most importantly, the change reconnects Manchester United with its traditional identity a culture defined by high expectations balanced with unity, respect, and collective purpose.
In replacing rigid authoritarianism with human-centred leadership, Carrick has not just changed rules; he has restored belief, dignity, and direction.
