Liverpool supporters were left with plenty to talk about after their side’s emphatic 5-2 win over West Ham United at Anfield, but much of the post-match discussion centered on a familiar and controversial topic — VAR. Among those weighing in was Mark Goldbridge, who voiced frustration over what he sees as continued inconsistency in decision-making, particularly regarding Virgil van Dijk’s goal.
The Reds extended their impressive run of form with a dominant display on home soil. Hugo Ekitike got the hosts off to a dream start, finding the net within the opening five minutes to set the tone for the afternoon. Midway through the first half, Liverpool captain Van Dijk doubled the advantage with a close-range header from a corner.
However, the goal was briefly reviewed by officials at Video Assistant Referee headquarters in Stockley Park due to concerns that Joe Gomez may have been in an offside position during the build-up.
Despite Gomez’s positioning, the officials determined that he did not interfere with play or obstruct the goalkeeper’s line of sight. As a result, the goal was allowed to stand. The decision sparked debate, particularly because of a similar situation earlier in the season.
Back in November, during Liverpool’s 3-0 loss to Manchester City at the Etihad, Van Dijk had a goal ruled out under comparable circumstances. On that occasion, Andy Robertson was judged to have impeded Gianluigi Donnarumma, even though he did not make contact with the ball. That ruling left many Liverpool fans baffled at the time.
Goldbridge took to X shortly after Saturday’s goal to point out what he perceives as a contradiction. He argued that the two incidents were almost identical, yet resulted in opposite outcomes.
According to him, the approval of Van Dijk’s goal against West Ham effectively highlights that the disallowed effort against Manchester City should also have been given.
The debate underscores a wider frustration among Premier League fans about inconsistent application of VAR rules. Even though many would agree that the correct call was made this time — with Gomez not obstructing Mads Hermansen — the contrast with the earlier decision continues to fuel criticism of officiating standards in England’s top flight.
Such situations are likely to prompt further reflection from PGMOL chief Howard Webb, especially as scrutiny around refereeing decisions remains intense. While Liverpool FC fans will be satisfied that the comprehensive scoreline meant controversy did not influence the final outcome, questions about consistency remain.
From a footballing standpoint, Van Dijk’s goal also highlighted his recent attacking contribution.
The Dutch defender has now scored three times in his last six league appearances, showcasing Liverpool’s growing threat from set pieces since the turn of the year. Meanwhile, manager Arne Slot will likely be pleased with the attacking display but may still have concerns about conceding twice, despite the comfortable victory.
